In most parts of the world, people associated with the Muslim culture receive a lot of discrimination considering that their colleagues associate with terrorism activities.
The global war on terror has been a boon for publishing. Of the scores of books written from the sidelines by proselytizers, pundits, and professors, and from the front by reporters and the military, a few stand out as lending intellectual gravitas andmoral weight to the dominant narrative. Princeton University's Bernard Lewis put an Ivy League stamp of approval on the war as a literal unfolding of the "clash of civilizations"—a term which Lewis had earlier coined (though it is most often associated with Harvard's Samuel Huntington). Lewis went on to legitimize the rhetorical question, "Why do they hate us?" with an answer in the form of , published in 2003. In his subsequent addresses at various think tanks, Lewis would repeatedly treat the West and Islam as opposing monoliths while playing on latent fears that Islam might be on the verge of undermining a presumably autonomous Western and European identity.
Essay On Terrorism In Pakistan essay on terrorism in pakistan.
A report in December 2012 from the US-based Global Terrorism Index finds that the war on terror has made the terror far worse, even if it took place elsewhere than in the United States. In the decade after the attack 11 September 2001, roughly 90,000 people became victims of terrorism, half of them in three countries: Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. The worst year was 2007 when the Iraqi al-Qaeda-inspired resistance to the U.S. occupation culminated.
War on Terror Essay | Custom essay
Critics have said that the war against terrorism is a “permission” for a “permanent war” as the United States has put forward uncertain goals and the definition of terrorist groups is quite blurred.
War against terrorism essay for class 9 - …
There is an impact to this war both complex and staggering in its implications, for the Iraq conflict brings into question matters going to the foundations of the American government, and to the accepted criteria of warfare itself. In promoting Iraqi President Saddam Hussein as an enemy of the U.S., and one possessed of weapons of mass destruction, as well as direct ties to the covert operations of the terrorist group Al-Qaeda, the Bush government changed the face of how the need to go to war may be presented to the nation. As evidence increasingly supports, an extraordinary amount of obfuscation was created by President Bush's administration to justify a direct military action in Iraq. The ultimate importance of the war in Iraq, beyond all the many, immediate implications it has had on international relations, lies in how it has greatly altered public consciousness in regard to the necessity of war itself, and this in turn reflects the ethical questions of what makes war appropriate and/or necessary to begin with. Essentially, in manufacturing a war machine based upon insubstantial justifications, the Bush administration set in motion a national scrutiny and disapproval utterly removed from its expectations.
War Terrorism Thesis – 878215 | The River of Life …
Amnesty International has argued that the Patriot Act gives the U.S. government free rein to violate the civil rights of Americans from their constitution. The government Bush’s use of torture and secret prisons, etc. has increased resistance to the war against terrorism.
Persuasive essay on the war on terrorism. Research …
Besides direct control (dismantling terrorist cells, destruction of training camps, etc..), the war on terror implies as well the investigation and pressure on governments, organizations and individuals supporting terrorist organizations and freezing assets suspected of belonging to or being used by terrorist groups. It also includes financial aid to countries participating in the fight against terrorism, the growth of international police cooperation and cooperation between intelligence services (implementation of Alliance Base, headquartered in Paris) attempts at political reorganization of the Middle East decided by the Bush administration (the “Greater Middle East” project supported by the neocons), etc.