An overview of new communication technologies. Topics include the uses, evolution, diffusion, operation, and effects of new communication technologies.
Gestures: European Americans tend to use a "medium" range of gestures in usual conversation-not so large or frequent as Arabs or Southern Italians but not as restrained as the English or Japanese (Althen, 1988, pp.141- 142).
Dept of Communication Pumpkin Bowling
The “knowledge deficit fallacy.” A theory (either explicit or implicit, conscious or unconscious) that treats simple unfamiliarity with facts as the cause of the public’s failure to converge on the best available scientific evidence on human-caused climate change, human evolution, the safety of nuclear power generation, etc. The theory also assumes (explicitly or implicitly, consciously or unconsciously) that simple communication of the best available evidence will dispel public conflict over facts. [Date added Dec. 19, 2017]
Cross-Cultural Communication Strategies
Cultural cognition thesis. The conjecture that culture is prior to fact in debates over contested societal risks and related facts. Culture is prior not just in the normative sense that cultural values guide action conditional on beliefs about states of affairs; it is also prior in the positive sense that cultural commitments, through a variety of mechanisms, shape what individuals believe the relevant facts to be. [source: Kahan, Slovic, Braman & Gastil, 119, 1071-1109 (2006), p. 1083. Date added Dec. 23, 2017].
How to Write a Thesis Statement – Communication …
The Costs and Affordances of CMC Tools to Asian and American Users (paper) Leslie Setlock and Susan Fussell from Cornell University looked into how Asian and American users differ in their communication goals.
Cross Cultural Communication | Custom PHD Thesis
Sectarian harm. Refers to a set-back to interest the nature of which is dependent on assent to a partisan conception of the best way to live. A principal example is the offense individuals experience when they are exposed to behavior that expresses commitments to values alien to theirs. Precisely because such harms depend on—cannot be defined independently of—adherence to a particular conception of the best life, using law to avert or remedy them is illegitimate in a liberal state. [Source: Mill, On Liberty, ch. 1 (1859). Dated added: Dec. 26, 2017.]
Cross-cultural communication in the workplace essay
Secular harm. Refers to a set-back to interest the nature of which is independent of assent to any culturally partisan conception of the best way to live. Principal examples include damage to individuals’ physical security and impediments to their apprehension of collective knowledge. Precisely because such harms can be experienced universally by citizens of diverse cultural identities, protecting citizens from such set-backs is a legitimate end for law in a liberal state [Sources: Rawls, Political Liberalism 175, 217-18 (1993); & Mill, On Liberty, ch. 1 (1859). Date added: Dec. 26, 2017.]