Rolf Rendtorff was Emeritus Professor of Old Testament at the ..

Rendtorff has published many works on Old Testament subjects, but is notable chiefly for his 1977 book, "Das überlieferungsgeschichtliche Problem des Pentateuch" (The Problem of the Transmission of the Pentateuch). The book was a study of the question of Pentateuchal origins (the question of how the first five books of the bible - , , , and - came to be written), and appeared at the same time time as two other important books, ' (1975), and Hans Heinrich Schmid's Der sogenannte Jahwist (The So-called Yahwist) (1976). The three studies, appearing almost together, inaugurated a heated discussion in scholarly circles on the validity of the then-dominant consensus on Pentateuchal origins, the .

Rendtorff, Rolf. “Traditio-Historical Method and the Documentary Hypothesis.” In Proceedings

Rendtorff has published many works on Old Testament subjects, but was notable chiefly for his 1977 book, "Das überlieferungsgeschichtliche Problem des Pentateuch" (). The book was a study of the question of Pentateuchal origins (the question of how the first five books of the bible – , , , and – came to be written), and appeared at the same time as two other important books, ' (1975), and 's () (1976). The three studies, appearing almost together, inaugurated a heated discussion in scholarly circles on the validity of the then-dominant consensus on Pentateuchal origins, the .


Rolf Rendtorff's Supplementary Hypothesis of ..

Fragmentary hypotheses, seen notably in the work of Rolf Rendtorff and Erhard Blum, ..

most non-conservative institutions continue to teach the Wellhausian theory, at least in its general outlines, as if nothing had happened in Old Testament scholarship since the year 1880."

"Another problem with the theory is that it assumes that "Hebrew authors differ from any other writers known in the history of literature in that they alone were incapable of using more than one name for God," or for that matter, more than one style of writing. It is interesting that the Qur'an (Koran) uses multiple names for God, but few question that Muhammad was its sole author.


of Transmission in the Pentateuch

In 1878 published ("History of Israel, Vol 1"); the second edition he printed as ("Prolegomena to the History of Israel"), in 1883, and the work is better known under that name. (The second volume, a synthetic history titled ["Israelite and Jewish History"], did not appear until 1894 and remains untranslated.) Crucially, this historical portrait was based upon two earlier works of his technical analysis: "Die Composition des Hexateuchs" ("The Composition of the Hexateuch") of 1876/77 and sections on the "historical books" (Judges–Kings) in his 1878 edition of 's ("Introduction to the Old Testament").

Documentary hypothesis - Revolvy

and saw the Pentateuch developing from the gradual accretion of small unitsinto larger and larger works, a process which removes both J and E, and,significantly, implied a fragmentary rather than a documentary model for OldTestament origins;and , using a different model, envisaged an ongoing process ofsupplementation in which later authors modified earlier compositions and changedthe focus of the narratives.The most radical contemporary proposal has come from

Problem of the Process of Transmission in the …

Rendtorff studied under Gerhard von Rad—one of the first to apply form criticism to the Pentateuch—at the University of Heidelberg in the 1950s. Rendtorff would go on to refine his own theories about the composition of the Pentateuch. Rejecting the Documentary Hypothesis, he championed an approach that took into account the history of traditions in the Bible and looked at the “the Biblical text itself in its given form.” A distinguished scholar, he elaborated on his views about the Hebrew Bible and Christian-Jewish understanding in .

Secret Bases wiki • Rolf Rendtorff

At the end of the preface, the contributors declare that this volume would have reached its goal when Pentateuchal research in the twenty-first century could get along without the Yahwist. But they leave open the question whether research should continue with the old methods, in particular with the documentary hypothesis or, more precisely, with the torso of this method that would be left after the Yahwist would have passed away.