They found that people who have a strong tendency to believe in a just world also tend to be more religious, more authoritarian, more conservative, more likely to admire political leaders and existing social institutions, and more likely to have negative attitudes toward underprivileged groups.
More specifically, whetheror not an individual believes that the world is a safe, just place can affect thatpersons interpretation of an event, and therefore, impact how that individualrelates to the people involved.
What does JUST-WORLD HYPOTHESIS mean?" Videos
Lerner's research was influenced by repeatedly witnessing the tendency of observers to for their suffering. During his clinical training as a psychologist, he observed the treatment of mentally ill persons by the health care practitioners with whom he worked. Though he knew the clinicians to be kindhearted, educated people, he observed that they blamed patients for their own suffering. He was also surprised at hearing his students derogate the poor, seemingly oblivious to the that contribute to poverty. In one of his studies on rewards, he observed that when one of two men was chosen at random to receive a reward for a task, observers felt more praise toward the man who had been randomly rewarded than toward the man who did not receive a reward. Existing social psychological theories, including , could not fully explain these phenomena. His desire to understand the processes that caused these phenomena led Lerner to conduct his first experiments on what is now called the just world hypothesis.
JUST-WORLD HYPOTHESIS, - Psychology Dictionary
Furthermore, the legitimacy of cosmic catastrophic hypotheses in science was acknowledged both by Sagan and Mulholland, but the specific hypotheses of Velikovsky were attacked (and obviously the scientists are in confusion as to how they can work historically and empirically with the hypotheses that they admit.)"
Find Ralph Juergens's essay "Reconciling Celestial Mechanics andVelikovskian Catastrophism" at .
Just World Victimology: Revisiting Lerner in the Study …
The “belief in a just world” is an attempt to capture in a phrase one of the ways, if not the way, that people come to terms with – make sense out of – find meaning in, their experiences. We do not believe that things just happen in our world; there is a pattern to events which conveys not only a sense of orderliness or predictability, but also the compelling experience of appropriateness expressed in the typically implicit judgment, “Yes, that is the way it should be.
Religion, Justice and The Just World Hypothesis | …
The more I learn about the Just World Fallacy, the more I have personally come to believe that it isn’t just a belief that the world is fair, rather it’s a belief that the world is fair towards us; I am the centre of my universe and it is that universe that is fair. So if I am rewarded by chance, it is always something I have done to deserve it, whereas somebody else could have been lucky. But if I am punished by chance, I don’t deserve it (unless I suffer from depression or did something really bad), someone else did something that caused this.
Justice and The Just World Hypothesis ”
The Just World Fallacy (aka the Just World Hypothesis) is the assumption or belief that we get what we deserve, meaning that those of us who perform actions that are deemed good will be rewarded eventually, and that those of us who perform actions that are deemed bad will be punished eventually. Depending on the person judging, the reward/punishment could be in the present, the near future, the distant future or beyond death. This belief assumes that this is a “universal force that restores moral balance,” whether or not we call that force “God.” It follows from this belief that we judge the behaviour by what we think should have happened to them in this fair universe: winners deserve to win no matter how much luck had to do with it, and victims deserve to suffer no matter how blameless they are.