The Death of the Documentary Hypothesis - Patheos

The foregoing ought to be sufficient, though, to demonstrate that the JEDP theory, or the Graf-Wellhausen documentary hypothesis, is of no value for either the student or the scholar of the Old Testament.

However, what had begun with the identification of two underlying documents soon grew.

You shall listen to him in whatever he tells you.'" Three witnesses (four including Luke) claimed that Moses was the author of the first five books of the Old Testament or the Torah.

Then what of the documentary hypothesis?

The Documentary Hypothesis by Julius Wellhausen Essay …

There was an early E, a late E, the Jehovistic document, and finally Deuteronomy.

Is there another way of understanding 1 Kings 6:1? To pioneering Bible archaeologist William F. Albright, the number looks less like an exact figure, but rather a round figure of 12 generations of 40 years each, the usual conventional length. But if men were 20 to 30 at the birth of their eldest son as often seemed the case, the period of 12 generations would actually bring the date of the Exodus to the 13th century BC.

Julius Wellhausen and the Documentary Hypothesis

In an attempt to reconcile inconsistencies in the biblical text, and refusing to accept forced explanations to harmonize them, 18th and 19th century biblical scholars using eventually arrived at the theory that the Torah was composed of selections woven together from several, at times inconsistent, sources, each originally a complete and independent document. The hypothesis developed slowly over the course of the 19th century, by the end of which it was generally agreed that there were four main sources, combined into their final form by a series of , R. These four sources came to be known as the Yahwist, or Jahwist, J (J being the equivalent of the letter Y); the Elohist, E; the Deuteronomist, D, (the name comes from the Book of Deuteronomy, D's contribution to the Torah); and the Priestly Writer, P.

Documentary hypothesis - CreationWiki, the …

Wellhausen's uncompromisingly secular approach to the Bible andthe detailed cogency of his re-creation of early Israelite history(one which dismissed such fundamental Jewish beliefs as theirstatus as God's "chosen people," and even the originallymonotheistic nature of ancient Israelite religion) led toaccusations from conservative Jews, and even Christians, that hewas motivated not by the dispassionate search for truth but by adesire to destroy the Jewish religion. This accusation wasfrequently cast in terms of "anti-Semitism," but, whatever thetruth of these accusations, insinuations of a causative connectionbetween Wellhausen's endeavour and the events that transpired inGermany in the decades after his death are problematic at most.

Documentary hypothesis - WikiVisually

In the summer of 1872, William Robertson Smith, reputedly the greatest living Semitic scholar in England, met Wellhausen while working in Arabic with Paul Lagarde in Gottingen. This connection would later bear fruit. During the years 1881 to 1888, Smith became the co-editor of the 9th edition of the and employed Wellhausen to write the lengthy articles on Israel, Pentateuch, and Septuagint, as well as several smaller entries on Moses and Moab. The 9th edition of the both advocated and espoused biological evolution and the critical study of the Bible, two areas very inimical to the Judaic-Christian tradition.