Yet neither the proponents of logical positivism nor their criticsever attempted to explain the nature of experimentation that producesall-important observational statements. And the reason for this wasvery simple: they didn’t think that there was anything interesting toexplain. Their views on the relationship between theory and evidencewere diametrically opposed, but they all found only the final productof experimentation, namely observational statements, philosophicallyinteresting. As a result, the experimental process itself was setaside in their philosophical study of science. This has graduallychanged only with the advent of New Experimentalism, with IanHacking’s work at its forefront.
Scientists can really change the world with their hypotheses and findings. In an effort to improve the world we live in, all it takes is an initial hypothesis that is well-stated, founded in truth, and can withstand extensive research and experimentation. Seek out your independent and dependent variables and go on out here and make this world a better place. Good luck!
What Is a Hypothesis? The Scientific Method - …
The difference in attitudes toward the resolution of discord is one ofthe important distinctions between Pickering’s and Franklin’s view ofscience. Franklin remarks that it is insufficient simply to say thatthe resolution is socially stabilized. The important question is howthat resolution was achieved and what were the reasons offered forthat resolution. If we are faced with discordant experimental resultsand both experimenters have offered reasonable arguments for theircorrectness, then clearly more work is needed. It seems reasonable, insuch cases, for the physics community to search for an error in one,or both, of the experiments.
Hypothesis/Theory/Law: The Importance of Explaining Things Clearly.
What I liked about the experiment is that with household size objects, one can get directly to a situation where the balance between physics and chemistry is initially equal.
Chemistry - one; hypothesis - Wattpad
These strategies along with Hacking’s intervention and independentconfirmation constitute an epistemology of experiment. They provide uswith good reasons for belief in experimental results, They do not,however, guarantee that the results are correct. There are manyexperiments in which these strategies are applied, but whose resultsare later shown to be incorrect (examples will be presented below).Experiment is fallible. Neither are these strategies exclusive orexhaustive. No single one of them, or fixed combination of them,guarantees the validity of an experimental result. Physicists use asmany of the strategies as they can conveniently apply in any givenexperiment.
Study Mastering Chemistry Assignment 1 notes from katie a
Regardless, some may argue that the chemical aspect is very minimal becausethe water level sometimes rises to one third of the volume, but underperfect conditions reaction condition, the reaction chemistry can onlyaccount for a maximum ten percent water level rise.
View Notes - Chemistry Final Review from CHEMISTRY 161 at Rutgers
Although a detailed discussion of the disagreement between Staleyand Galison would take us too far from the subject of this essay, theyboth agree that arguments are offered for the correctness ofexperimental results. Their disagreement concerns the nature of thosearguments. (For further discussion see Franklin, (2002), pp. 9–17).