Charles Darwin, in His Theory of Evolution

Who controls the money supply and who meets in secrecy each year? Always follow the money and secrecy trail. People have been taking secrets to their grave for too long and its time to change this. We humans as a collective need to take charge of our future, in terms of everything, ie spiritualism, politics, money, science, space exploration, etc. And stop paying taxes until this happens!!!!!!

Any evolutionaryaccount of language, then, must address both biological and culturalevolution.

If the traits of interest to evolutionary psychologists areuniversally distributed, then we should expect to find them in allhumans. This partly explains the stock that evolutionarypsychologists put in cross cultural psychological tests (see e.g. Buss1990). If we find evidence for the trait in a huge cross sectionof humans, then this supports our view that the trait is an adaptation—on the assumption that adaptations are organ-like traits that areproducts of natural selection but not subject to variation. Butgiven the wider scope view of evolution defended by philosophers ofbiology, this method of testing seems wrong-headed as a test of anevolutionary hypothesis. Certainly such testing can result in thevery interesting results that certain preference profiles are widelyshared cross culturally but the test does not speak to the evolutionaryhypothesis that the preferences are adaptations (cf. Lloyd 1999;Buller 2005).


The concept of Environment of Evolutionary Adaptiveness:

Taken together, these concepts argue for viewing world politics increasingly as a group of tightly bound actors evolving together, characterized more by context than their innate nature, vulnerable to surprise from new groups whose members decide independently to organize themselves in new ways and for new purposes.


Key words: Evolution; Noncooperative game theory; Evolutionary ..

The () is issued by the Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics to provide an international forum for new theoretical and empirical approaches to evolutionary and institutional economics. , free from the view of equilibrium economics and methodological individualism, should face the diversity of human behavior and dynamic transformation of institutions. In , “economics” is used in its broadest sense. It covers areas from the classic research in economic history, economic thought, economic theory, and management science to emerging research fields such as economic sociology, bio-economics, evolutionary game theory, agent-based modeling, complex systems study, econo-physics, experimental economics, and so on. follows the belief that a truly interdisciplinary discussion is needed to propel the investigation in the dynamic process of socio-economic change where institutions as emergent outcomes of human actions do matter. Although is an official journal of the Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics, it welcomes non-members' contributions from all parts of the world. All the contributions are refereed under strict scientific criteria, although does not apply monolithic formalistic measure to them. Evolution goes hand in hand with diversities; this is also the spirit of .

Evolutionary game theory in the social sciences

The Victorian age was filled with new discoveries and new notions and philosophies that changed England, Europe, and moreover, the world including: Darwin’s highly debated Theory of Evolution, Fleming’s discovery of Penicillin, the worldwide Industrial Revolution, and the invention of cars, telephones, and photography....

Evolutionary Games and Equilibrium Selection | The …

The () is issued by the Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics to provide an international forum for new theoretical and empirical approaches to evolutionary and institutional economics. , free from the view of equilibrium economics and methodological individualism, should face the diversity of human behavior and dynamic transformation of institutions. In , “economics” is used in its broadest sense. It covers areas from the classic research in economic history, economic thought, economic theory, and management science to emerging research fields such as economic sociology, bio-economics, evolutionary game theory, agent-based modeling, complex systems study, econo-physics, experimental economics, and so on. follows the belief that a truly interdisciplinary discussion is needed to propel the investigation in the dynamic process of socio-economic change where institutions as emergent outcomes of human actions do matter. Although is an official journal of the Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics, it welcomes non-members' contributions from all parts of the world. All the contributions are refereed under strict scientific criteria, although does not apply monolithic formalistic measure to them. Evolution goes hand in hand with diversities; this is also the spirit of .

Focus areas of the Review (not exhaustive):
- Foundations of institutional and evolutionary economics
- Criticism of mainstream views in the social sciences
- Knowledge and learning in socio-economic life
- Development and innovation of technologies
- Transformation of industrial organizations and economic systems
- Experimental studies in economics
- Agent-based modeling of socio-economic systems
- Evolution of the governance structure of firms and other organizations
- Comparison of dynamically changing institutions of the world
- Policy proposals in the transformational process of economic life