薩丕爾 萨丕尔-沃夫假说(Sapir–Whorf hypothesis、语言相对论

Other universalist researchers dedicated themselves to dispelling other notions of linguistic relativity, often attacking specific points and examples given by Whorf. For example, Ekkehart Malotki's monumental study of time expressions in Hopi presented many examples that challenged Whorf's interpretation of Hopi language and culture as being "timeless".

Died: 我也抛个砖。 这个命题实际上是个很著名的假说:沃尔夫假说(Sapir–Whorf hypothesis),又称为语言相对论(linguistic relativity)。.

In linguistica, l'ipotesi di Sapir-Whorf (o Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis, in sigla SWH), conosciuta anche come "ipotesi della relatività linguistica", afferma che lo.


Sapir-Whorf hypothesis | Define Sapir-Whorf hypothesis …

The principle of linguistic relativity is sometimes called the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis,.

, the originator of the , believed that the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis applied to computer languages (without actually mentioning the hypothesis by name). His lecture, "Notation as a tool of thought", was devoted to this theme, arguing that more powerful notations aided thinking about computer algorithms. The essays of explore similar themes, such as a conceptual hierarchy of computer languages, with more expressive and succinct languages at the top.


The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis: The limits of our language are ..

a. "Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis (linguistic relativity) is the idea that the varying cultural concepts and categories inherent in different languages affect the cognitive classification of the experienced world in such a way that speakers of different languages think and behave differently because of it."

a definition of the Sapir- Whorf Hypothesis ..

From the test results of the two issues above, the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis was discredited first and then vindicated second, and this trip takes 70 years to make a whole circle. In fact, this 70 years can be reduced into months if two questions were asked.

Examples of Sapir-Whorf Theory? | Yahoo Answers

The idea was first expressed clearly in the German national romantic thought of the early 19th century where language was seen as the expression of the spirit of a nation, as put particularly by . It was later embraced by figures in the incipient school of American anthropology such as and . Sapir's student added observations of how he perceived these linguistic differences to have consequences in human cognition and behaviour. Whorf has since been seen as the primary proponent of the principle of linguistic relativity.

22/10/2009 · Examples of Sapir-Whorf Theory

Whorf's insistence on the importance of linguistic relativity as a factor in human cognition attracted opposition from many sides. Psychologists and decided to put Whorf's assumptions and assertions to the test. They formulated the principle of linguistic relativity as a testable hypothesis and undertook a series of experiments testing whether traces of linguistic relativity could be determined in the domain of color perception. In the 1960s the idea of linguistic relativity fell out of favor in the academic establishment, since the prevalent paradigm in linguistics and anthropology, personified in , stressed the universal nature of human language and cognition. When the 1969 study of and showed that color terminology is subject to universal semantic constraints, the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis was seen as completely discredited.

This has nothing to do with the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis

For Lx and Ly as two different languages with very different cultures and histories, it will be very obvious that Lx and Ly will be quite different in the ps-sphere. Different cultures have different traditions and different ways of doing business, that is, a different way of viewing and processing a "given" event. Of course, the varying cultural concepts and categories inherent in different languages (in ps-sphere) will definitely view a "given" event or object differently. Thus, if the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis is defined in this ps-sphere, it is, of course, absolutely correct.